Evaluating efficiency and ranking of technical efficient and inefficient units

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Industrial Engineering Technology, Higher Colleges of Technology, UAE

2 Department of Industrial Engineering, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, North Cyprus, via Mersin 10, Turkey

10.22121/aotp.2019.194950.1021

Abstract

Maintaining the efficiency score of efficient units and distinguishing between technical efficiency and efficiency are very essential topics in operations research. The Arash method is a new technique in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) for estimating the performance of units and ranking. The Arash method is based on additive DEA model (ADD). In this study we expand the Arash method by using facet analysis to modify the production possibility set (PPS). This modification avoids the effect of the weak part of PPS frontier which can propose a bias efficiency evaluation to DMUs placed on or compared with the weak part of the frontier. We integrated the attributes of the Arash method and modified variable return to scale model, consequently showing the true efficiency score and ranks of units associated with the weak part of the frontier, also identifying “technical efficient” and “inefficient” DMUs. The efficiency score of DMUs located at the strong part of the frontier remains the same, only those associated with the weak part are modified. A numerical example is used to show the effectiveness of the proposed model in comparison with the Arash method.

Keywords


Ibrahim, M. D., Daneshvar, S. (2018). Efficiency analysis of healthcare system in Lebanon using modified data envelopment analysis. Journal of healthcare engineering2018.

Ibrahim, M. D., Hocaoglu, M. B., Numan, B., Daneshvar, S. (2018). Estimating efficiency of Directive 2011/24/EU cross-border healthcare in member states. Journal of comparative effectiveness research7(8), 827-834.

Jamshidi, M., Saneie, M., Mahmoodirad, A., Lotfi, F. H., Tohidi, G. (2019). Uncertain RUSSEL data envelopment analysis model: A case study in iranian banks. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems37(2), 2937-2951.

Ibrahim, M. D., Ferreira, D. C., Daneshvar, S., Marques, R. C. (2019). Transnational resource generativity: Efficiency analysis and target setting of water, energy, land, and food nexus for OECD countries. Science of The Total Environment697, 134017.

Sanei, M., Hassasi, H. (2018). A polynomial-time algorithm to determine BCC efficient frontier without solving a mathematical programming problem. Annals of Optimization Theory and Practice1(1), 59-68.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research2(6), 429-444.

Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science30(9), 1078-1092.

Khezrimotlagh, D., Salleh, S., Mohsenpour, Z. (2012). A new method in data envelopment analysis to find efficient decision making units and rank both technical efficient and inefficient DMUs together. Applied Mathematical Sciences6(93), 4609-4615.

Daneshvar, S. (2009). The modification of BCC model using facet analysis. In American Conference on Applied Mathematics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mathematics and Computer in Science and Engineering (pp. 635-641).

Daneshvar, S., Izbirak, G., Javadi, A. (2014). Sensitivity analysis on modified variable returns to scale model in Data Envelopment Analysis using facet analysis. Computers & Industrial Engineering76, 32-39.

Banker, R. D., Thrall, R. M. (1992). Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of operational research62(1), 74-84.

Khezrimotlagh, D., Mohsenpour, P., Salleh, S., Mohsenpour, Z. (2014). A Review on Arash Method in Data Envelopment Analysis. Data Envelopment Analysis and Performance Measurement, 13.